Showing posts with label sexual abuse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sexual abuse. Show all posts

Saturday, 28 October 2017

It Could Never Happen Here

Most weeks when I come to write the Praise & Prayer News I know what the topic should be several days before.  It is therefore very encouraging to receive, so often, feedback telling me how apposite the contents proved.  On this occasion I have been staring at a blank sheet for several days.  Inspiration seemed to be absent.  But more recently, I have begun to feel that the topic had been given me and that I was too reluctant to recognise it.

I am indeed reluctant to write on this occasion, but since slowly waking up to the idea, I have had a growing urge to put fingers to keyboard.  So, here goes.

It is probable that you already know that several times a year I teach on a Safeguarding Course run by the Salvation Army.  The Army has an excellent programme that covers all their officers, cadets in training, and employees.  It’s a privilege to contribute to it.  I have also provided content for the Baptist Union and the Congregational Federation  My title for the Salvation Army sessions (taught through one day,) is how abuse can happen in a Christian context.

Sexual abuse has cast a direct shadow over my life on three occasion.  The first occasion was when I was about ten and was accosted  by a paedophile in a park.  That led to a very embarrassing interview with a mice female police officer.  The last experience was as a foster father of a teenage by with special needs.  Back then, we were less conversant with the right way to handle these situations.  I thought that confronting him and warning him would be adequate.  It wasn’t, and one day Doreen and I had a phone call from an officer from the Metropolitan Police, informing us he and colleagues were on their way to interview our foster son.  The man was part of a large paedophile ring and he had targeted a number of vulnerable children at a school for children with special needs.

In between these two occasions, I was a victim of sexual abuse within a Christian context, and my work with the Salvation Army, and others, is based on learning from that experience.  Over recent years the topic of sexual abuse has hardly been out of the news as stories have emerged about pop stars, comedians,  sports personalities, and more recently a film producer.  Along the way there have been far too many church-related stories and some denominations have found themselves under the glare of the media.

Despite all of these stories, I find far too often, churches and Christian organisations that take a “It could never happen here” attitude.  That is why I am glad, no matter how painful, to share my experience as a teaching tool.  It can, and does happen where it should never happen.  That includes churches and Christian organisations.  I first began to understand the nature of abuse, how to provide appropriate pastoral support for past victims, and how to manage allegedly repentant abusers, when I was invited to research and help write a book.  Time for Action remains probably the most helpful book on the topic.  After that I was part of a team writing a report for the Anglican House of Bishops.  Responding Well  is now a useful tool in the Church of England’s campaign to make their churches safer places.

What happened to me took place over time during the late sixties and early seventies.  For a long time I saw it as merely inappropriate behavior.  After I blew the whistle and was interviewed by the police I was shocked to learn that it was criminal.  The only reason I blew the whistle was that I had discovered that several others in the organisation also had ‘inappropriate’ experiences from the man who was the head of the evangelistic organisation I had joined as a teenager.  In the research for Time for Action I had learned that committing sexual abuse is very often habitual, possibly addictive in nature.  I wanted to protect others, and was not seeking any punishment for the offender when I reported it.

The fact that the abuser had managed to abuse several within the organisation was largely down to misunderstanding about forgiveness.  Each abused person had declared that they forgave the man, who was never held to account.  We gave out forgiveness cheaply and unbiblically.  As a result the man continued to give in to his propensity unrestrained.

In teaching about this, I explain that there are three factors that can contribute to risk of sexual abuse.  These are the nature of the abuser, the nature of the abused, and the weaknesses of the organisational context where abuse has or could take place.  For any church or Christian organisation to be safe, all three need to be managed appropriately.

The man who abused me is a man who is obsessed with power.  He presented himself within the organisation and beyond to be a man with a special anointing from God, and endowed with considerable ministry gifts.  He certainly had a significant personality and was indeed a very gifted preacher and gospel singer.  He preached holiness, and ran the organization to exacting standards based on passages of scripture.  But behind the scenes, something dark was happening away from public gaze.  He was a co-founder of the organisation, but presented himself as the founder/director.  While the organisation initially had a managing committee and later a board of trustees, these were personally appointed by himself so he remained completely unaccountable.

After I had been in the organisation for perhaps a year, I and some of my peers (all in our teens) had discovered that in 1959 he had been disciplined within an Assemblies of God church for sexual misconduct.  When we confronted him about his, he admitted that he had a homosexual nature and asserted that God had made him that way, but he had never committed a homosexual act.  But he had his own definition of homosexual acts, that would not match the legal definition.  At the time when we spoke with him, and what he later did to me and others, homosexuality was not only frowned upon within Christian circles, it was a criminal offence.

He claimed that because he was sexually frustrated, and was in a constant battle to stay holy, this was what gave him his bad temper and other negative behavioural traits.  Further he claimed that God’s blessing on his ministry demonstrated that he was in a right relationship with God.  He claimed the offence for which he had been disciplined had been put right before God and no one had a right to bring it up.  We ended up feeling sorry for him.  Now, it seemed that the many flaws we saw in his character and behaviour were excusable.  With hindsight, he would be deemed to be an inappropriate person to lead an organisation and have charge of vulnerable people.

He was certainly a very gifted person.  He ran the organisation in a dictatorial style.  I was frequently called upon to sort out the crises he left in his wake.  But I felt that working in this organisation was where God wanted me to be.  Various prophetic utterances had confirmed this, and had warned that it was a difficult calling in which I would have to carry a back-bending burden.  My vulnerability related to my young age, my sexual ignorance and naivety, that I was too easily impressed, and that my spiritual guiding themes were love and forgiveness.  So I kept on loving what was often unlovely and forgiving what was wrong.

The primary organisational weakness was the lack of accountability for its leader.  This was ironic as the leader held everyone else accountable 24x7, controlling all we did with our time and demanding absolute commitment and obedience.  Much later, when maturity enabled me to have confidence to challenge what was unreasonable in his actions, this led to serious arguments, in which I was usually portrayed as the villain.

From the start, the nature of the organisation not only required of me total commitment and obedience, he also ensured that my church membership link was severed, and that my parents influence was reduced to almost nil.  There was no other person providing teaching and counselling in my life.  Worse still, I was treated as a man called by God to be his aid, somewhat like Timothy.  I drove him everywhere he went, provided secretarial and financial administration, calmed him down after bouts of temper, and, until I married, hardly left his side.  He told me that he was utterly dependent upon me.  What he might have said about me to others may well have been different.

Sexual abusers groom their victims.  They also groom other around and the situation to enable the abuse.  His role provided opportunity, but also gave him cover to get away unchallenged.  I do not see that you need to know details of the grooming process or the nature of the abuse committed.  But it is important to add something about forgiving.

When I teach about how abuse can happen in a church, I explain how I found myself caught up in something I hated and wanted desperately to be free from.  It was like a spiders web.  If I failed to allow his conduct to continue, he threatened to abandon Christian values and go headlong into a public ungodly behaviour.  When I eventually managed to break free, I confronted the founder and told him that I forgave him.  He made no response .  I also told him that I would blow the whistle if he ever did to another person what he had done to me.  Seventeen years later I received a formal report of similar behaviour and took action.

By then I had left the organisation but had continued to share in ministry in a local church.  Neither the trustees of the organisation nor the elders of the church were willing to take action to investigate what was then being denied by both the abuser and the abused. Consequently, nothing was done at that time, and it was several years later when I reported everything to the police.  Meanwhile I had collected several other testimonies relating to sexual misconduct.  On each occasion he had ‘been forgiven’.

He was arrested, charged, tried and sentenced to two years in prison.  The irony was that on the charges relating to what he did to me he was found not guilty, but on similar charges relating to the more recent incidents he was found guilty.  Throughout that process I received hate mail, and was accused of destroying God’s work.

Sexual abusers, not only fulfil their fantasies, they often exploit the normal sexuality of their victims.  They are usually manipulative and will create a sense of dependency if they can.  They leave people with scars that might never heal.  I still offer forgiveness to him conditional upon true repentance, but have yet to hear my abuser admit his guilt or apologise to me or the several others he abused.

I have learned that anyone could become an abuser and that anyone could become a victim.  It could happen in your church or a Christian organisation.  The abuser might give every sign of being a good Christian but watch out for unusual close relationships with anyone with a weaker personality.  Abusers like to have control.  Ensure that everyone is kept as safe as possible.  Watch out for those who might be particularly vulnerable.  That’s not just the young or elderly.  We all become vulnerable from time to time.  Make sure that leaders are held to account and that good practise guidelines are being followed.  All who are likely to exercise influence over others need a DBS check (used to be a CRB certificate).

So, I have struggled through sharing how abuse happened within a Christian organisation where the gospel was preached and holiness taught , and where there was much fruitfulness.  It has been painful.  I am left wondering whether anyone will say that this is apposite for them.  Telling and hearing stories of sexual abuse is not easy.  If I have offended anyone, I am sorry.  I am surprised how often, in all kinds of situations, people who hear something of my story, afterwards share their own sad experiences.  I hear these far too often and also often from surprising people.

If you have a story to share but do not feel you have anyone you can talk with, please feel that you can trust me, but tell me you have had an abusive experience before you share any details.  I will listen carefully, but if you report what is essentially criminal - or even possibly criminal - the law may require me to report it.  But what is done in darkness needs to come into the light.  Ignoring what has been done does not bring healing.  Giving forgiveness where there has been no admission of responsibility on the part of the abuser just makes others vulnerable.  When abused people are able to find the courage to talk about what has happened it is making the world a safer place.

If the leaders/clergy of your church have never read Time for Action, it is published by Churches Together in Britain and Ireland, endorsed by all the main denominations in the UK, and I am one of the distributors.  Drop me a line.

I started this missive by stating that this was not going to be an easy thing to write.  It hasn’t been.  But I have a deep conviction that this is both right and the right time.  May I ask that you pray for those who read this and who have suffered their own hurt.

Thank you.

Barry Osborne
28th October 2017.

From the Diary
Monday 30th - School Assembly, Lubenham
Tuesday 31st - Safeguarding Teaching, Salvation Army College, London
Sunday 5th November - Market Harborough Congregational Church
Throughout this time I will be busy with administration and writing.

Friday, 11 April 2014

Guilty or Not Guilty?

I wonder what your personal and private response has been to outcomes from recent high profile sex crimes trials.  My own response has been to regret that such trials are dealt with by juries and of course that the media are unhelpful.

There is little worse than finding yourself as front page news as a result of accusations that are false.  Such false allegations can ruin careers and lives even if they are found not guilty by a jury of their peers. The recent series of high profile cases has brought some criticism of the CPS but I wonder if it might be helpful if I share some of my own insight into the system.

A man I know lived with the knowledge that an older and senior Christian leader had entrapped him in what he considered to be inappropriate sexual activity when he was very much younger and naive.  It had left him feeling dirty, guilty and confused.  But he had forgiven the older man, warning him that if he ever discovered that the older man had acted similarly to others he would blow the whistle.

Life went on apparently normally for about another 20 years until he heard of another young man who had allegedly suffered similar experiences as he worked with the older man.  Immediately he took steps to encourage a thorough but discreet investigation through the local church and Christian organisation in which the older man worked.  All attempts proved useless even after several other men made sworn affidavits (the same as testimony under oath) alleging sexual misconduct by the older man.  It also meant that the first younger man had to talk about personal things he felt to be shameful.  That would have been costly. All this happened some years ago when churches and Christian organisations were not as well informed about reporting allegations to the police.

Another twelve years passed at which time the original younger man - now middle aged - became concerned that others might be at risk.  By then he had discovered that sexual abuse can often become habitual and even addictive behaviour.  Though he hated to do it he felt he had to talk to the police.  To reveal that improper behaviour had taken place in a Christian context felt shameful.  However, he was shocked when the response of the police was to state that what had happened to him those many years before was criminal and not just inappropriate.

A detailed statement was recorded and the police asked to see the affidavits.  But the solicitor who had been entrusted with the documents had shredded the files!  A statement was taken from the second younger man (now also middle aged) and the information passed to the CPS who decided there was sufficient evidence to bring the matter to court.  On being arrested the older man confessed to the activities reported but claimed that he was the innocent victim and not the perpetrator.  The case eventually came to court after several more years and the older man pleaded not guilty.

The not guilty plea meant that the two who had been the victims of his abuse had to relate graphically the things that had been done to them. The younger man who had blown the whistle spoke clearly and confidently as he was led through his statement and then cross examined.  The other younger man shook visibly and wept as he gave his evidence and was cross examined.  Both found this an ordeal.

The barrister acting for the CPS had arrived late and refused to talk with the prosecution witnesses before the trial began.  It soon appeared that he could have been better prepared.  By contrast the barrister representing the man on trial had come prepared with material that might have been refuted if the CPS barrister had been more prepared.  An additional problem was that a significant proportion of the jury were younger men and women who would have had difficulty in understanding the culture at the time the original alleged offences took place.

Ironically the man was found guilty on all charges relating to the second younger man but not guilty on all charges relating to the younger man who had blown the whistle!  The police and CPS were shocked at what they saw as injustice.  However, the court of law had passed its verdict.  Knowing the man who had blown the whistle I have no doubt as to his integrity.  For him it had been a costly journey over many years.  He would be left with the shadow of the abuse he had experienced hanging over him with no proper closure.  I cannot help but wonder whether there are complainants in recent cases that might  find themselves feeling similarly.  But men have stood trial before their peers and proclaimed innocent.  In the eyes of the law that is what they are.

Before the CPS bring sexual abuse cases to court they have to be strongly convinced that the evidence is sufficient to obtain a guilty verdict and, where there are several witnesses, that there is no conflict of evidence.  So coming back to the story I have shared with you (one of a number of cases with which I am familiar) what have I concluded?

It is clear that there are guilty people who are found not guilty and innocent people that are found guilty.  The outcome in a court depends substantially on the experience and skill of the barristers.  Courtrooms are places where a drama is performed with several actors. A witty and well prepared barrister who can make a passionate case for his/her client is of value.  A barrister who has not invested time and emotion in engaging with the case is a liability.  Court cases are costly financially so if the prosecution or defence has sufficient funds they will be able to employ the best firms to represent them.  That is not just.  It is not only about the facts; it is about a performance that convinces - or fails to convince - the jury.

In my opinion bringing such cases to court using the present system carries risks to both parties and is incredibly painful either for someone innocently accused or those who have to relate hurtful experiences.  Furthermore we are risking justice itself.  I would much rather have such cases heard in private before a panel of judges and determined on a majority decision of that court.  I believe this might be the case in France.

But no human system of justice can be 100% perfect.  By contrast, this is not he case when we stand before God.  In Psalm 51 David pleads guilty to the dreadful crimes he committed.  He offers no plea of mitigation.  He describes himself to be a sinner and uses all three concepts of sin within Hebrew understanding.  I love his statement about the one before whom we will all one day stand "...you are right in your verdict and justified when you judge."

Many men and women might boast "I was found not guilty" but might know in their hearts that they are guilty, But the fallible courts in which we stand on earth will be eclipsed by that greater time of judgement that is inevitable.  Better to plead guilty here and hear God's gracious words of pardon now than to plead not guilty here only to hear that overturned in eternity. What matters most is not our state in the eyes of the law but our state in the eyes of God.

Thank you for your prayers
Were you praying for me around 4.30 to 5.00 last Saturday afternoon (5th April)?  If so, thank you as I was saved from a potentially serious accident when driving home from Devon.  It had been a very busy but fruitful time there.  On Thursday, after the morning's Lent Bible Discussion, I had travelled from Leicestershire to Brayford in north Devon to work throughout Friday with the Methodist Church.  On Saturday I had called in on a Congregational Church on Exmoor to encourage the minister, and then enjoyed lunch with old Christian friends near Tiverton.  Thursday to Sunday was an intensive time of work (approximately 48 hours of work over the four days).

We had also had a profitable day on Tuesday, firstly with the visit to Gartree Prison in the afternoon and then with a planning meeting for Hope in our Villages that will involve our church in Yelvertoft, Northamptonshire.  I had experienced a very blessed service on Sunday 30th March at Gartree Prison, and numbers in the male voice choir have been growing each week for three weeks.

Please continue to pray for the churches and people following all these activities.

On Palm Sunday I will be preaching at Yelvertoft Parish Church at a Joint Service in the village.  On Wednesday 16th we are holding our next Messy Church event.  See www.yelvertoftchurch.org.uk for more information about our ministry there.

As we celebrate Easter over coming days I pray that your heart will leap at the wonder of the gospel we proclaim.

Happy Easter.

Barry

Friday, 5 March 2010

New insights gained today

Down to London today to work with others on the report being prepared for the Church of England Bishops on responding well to those in the churches who have been sexually abused.  It was a productive day as far as work is concerned but there were a couple of spin-off aspects personal to me.

During the afternoon I suddenly realised that I had unnecessarily assumed responsibility for trying to get an offender to get right with God and with those that he has hurt.  This was creating an unhelpful situation for me with disturbing dreams, but I am now confident that I need to let go and leave him to God.  I have tried many times in the past to encourage godly repentance but the line has to be drawn now.  If he were to repent and want to put things right I would be delighted, but for now I leave him to God.

The second insight that came today was that often those who experience sexual abuse suffer long term problems because it is the abuse of power and the controlling behaviour of their abusers that led to the sexual abuse that is the problem.  It is possible to be free from the dark shadow cast by the act or acts of abuse suffered but the underlying personality and behaviour of the abuser as a manipulative and controlling person is what seems - at least in some cases - to cast a longer shadow.  Recognising this is a step towards release.

A third insight was how the feelings and emotions experienced at the time of the abuse can complicate future attempts to address what happened.  For example, a young child who has been abused experiences certain emotions, but their immaturity might mean they are unable to process these.  Many years later in adult life, even when they have been able to talk about what happened, those childhood and limiting emotions still provide the context in which they recall what happened, and therefore the emotional context in which they try to work through the consequences.  The emotions might even appear irrational but they are likely to be powerful and hard to address until they have realised what has happened.

So I continue to learn how much damage and mess can be made of peoples lives by those who satisfy their sexual proclivities at the expense of others.  We continue to see the vast majority of Christian leaders ignorant of these issues and so we also see a lot of hurt and damaged people (possibly as many as 1 in 4) either left feeling unable to speak about what happened to them, or suffering from inappropriate and harmful pastoral responses.  Almost ten years on after writing "Time for Action" there is still need for much more action if our churches are to be places of healing.

If you are affected by this post and need to speak with someone I recommend Christian Survivors of Sexual Abuse at CSSA C/O 38 Sydenham Villas Rd, Cheltenham, Glos. GL5 26DZ.  Another useful organisation is MACSAS and they have a website at www.macsas.org.uk